* reads from the same variable are ordered.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* a given variable and a later write to that same variable are ordered.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* given variable and a later read from that same variable are ordered.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* writes to the same variable are ordered.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* process? This litmus test exercises LKMM's "propagation" rule.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* different process?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* (in P0() and P1()) is visible to external process P2().
*)
-{}
+{
+ spinlock_t mylock;
+ int x;
+ int y;
+ int z;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
* of the smp_load_acquire() invocations are replaced by READ_ONCE()?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+ int z;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* (AKA non-rf) link, so release-acquire is all that is needed.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+ int z;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* another control dependency and order would still be maintained.)
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* to the other?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* be prevented even with no explicit ordering?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* is usually better to use smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire().
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
*)
{
-y=z;
-z=0;
+ int x;
+ int *y=z;
+ int z=0;
}
P0(int *x, int **y)
*)
{
+ spinlock_t lo;
+ int x;
}
P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
*)
{
+ spinlock_t lo;
+ int x;
}
P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
* to see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
*)
-{}
+{
+ spinlock_t mylock;
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
* no ordering at all?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* pattern.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
*)
-{}
+{
+ spinlock_t mylock;
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
* cause the resulting test to be allowed.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* store propagation delays.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* store against a subsequent store?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* READ_ONCE(), is ordering preserved?
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* suffice, but not much else.)
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* variable that the preceding process reads.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* This litmus test demonstrates that LKMM is not fully multicopy atomic.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
* test has no ordering at all.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* is A-cumulative in LKMM.
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+}
P0(int *x)
{
* by CPUs not holding that lock.
*)
-{}
+{
+ spinlock_t mylock;
+ int x;
+ int y;
+ int z;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
* seen as ordered by a third process not holding that lock.
*)
-{}
+{
+ spinlock_t mylock;
+ int x;
+ int y;
+ int z;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
* involving locking.)
*)
-{}
+{
+ int x;
+ int y;
+ int z;
+}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
projects / linux-2.6-microblaze.git / commitdiff