In gcm_hash_len(), use be128 rather than u128. This fixes the following
sparse warnings:
crypto/gcm.c:252:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
crypto/gcm.c:252:19: expected unsigned long long [usertype] a
crypto/gcm.c:252:19: got restricted __be64 [usertype]
crypto/gcm.c:253:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
crypto/gcm.c:253:19: expected unsigned long long [usertype] b
crypto/gcm.c:253:19: got restricted __be64 [usertype]
No actual change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
struct ahash_request *ahreq = &pctx->u.ahreq;
struct crypto_gcm_ghash_ctx *gctx = &pctx->ghash_ctx;
- u128 lengths;
+ be128 lengths;
lengths.a = cpu_to_be64(req->assoclen * 8);
lengths.b = cpu_to_be64(gctx->cryptlen * 8);