irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.
Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250319092951.37667-37-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250518032330.2959766-5-sboyd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain for bus %d\n", bus_index);
- bus->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus);
+ bus->domain = irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(node), &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus);
if (!bus->domain) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
return -ENOMEM;