drm/i915/trace: i915_request.prio is a signed value

Don't confuse the poor developer by writing a negative value as a very
large positive, as the flow of requests is already complex enough.

Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128151647.3820659-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 162c76a..bc854ad 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
                             __field(u16, instance)
                             __field(u32, seqno)
                             __field(u32, port)
-                            __field(u32, prio)
+                            __field(s32, prio)
                            ),
 
            TP_fast_assign(
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
                           __entry->port = port;
                           ),
 
-           TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%llu, seqno=%u, prio=%u, port=%u",
+           TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%llu, seqno=%u, prio=%d, port=%u",
                      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
                      __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
                      __entry->prio, __entry->port)