smb: client: make consitent use of spin_lock_irq{save,restore}() in smbdirect.c
There is a mix of using spin_lock(), spin_lock_irq() and
spin_lock_irqsave() and it seems at least enqueue_reassembly() was wrong
in using just spin_lock() as it's called via recv_done() from a SOFTIRQ
as we're using IB_POLL_SOFTIRQ.
And Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst section
"Cheat Sheet For Locking" says:
- Otherwise (== data can be touched in an interrupt), use
spin_lock_irqsave() and
spin_unlock_irqrestore().
So in order to keep it simple and safe we use that version
now. It will help merging functions into common code and
have consistent locking in all cases.
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>