s390/uv: convert gmap_destroy_page() from follow_page() to folio_walk
authorDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Fri, 2 Aug 2024 15:55:21 +0000 (17:55 +0200)
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mon, 2 Sep 2024 03:26:01 +0000 (20:26 -0700)
commit85a7e5432dba4c750129797feb399a7bff8b241f
tree0193ce5298414855ca160a116f86498c264c72b0
parent8710f6ed34e7bcf98971d65acfb5eaed5fc469b0
s390/uv: convert gmap_destroy_page() from follow_page() to folio_walk

Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the UV calls under
PTL -- which likely should be fine.

No need for an additional reference while holding the PTL:
uv_destroy_folio() and uv_convert_from_secure_folio() raise the refcount,
so any concurrent make_folio_secure() would see an unexpted reference and
cannot set PG_arch_1 concurrently.

Do we really need a writable PTE?  Likely yes, because the "destroy" part
is, in comparison to the export, a destructive operation.  So we'll keep
the writability check for now.

We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page().  Likely we don't care
about that here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240802155524.517137-9-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
arch/s390/kernel/uv.c