btrfs: drop the path before adding block group sysfs files

btrfs: drop the path before adding block group sysfs files

Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the
following lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
	 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
	 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30
	 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0
	 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90
	 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0
	 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
	 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210
	 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0
	 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80
	 do_mount+0x75/0x90
	 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
	 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
	 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
	 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
	 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80
	 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0
	 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0
	 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0
	 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs]
	 open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs]
	 legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60
	 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0
	 fc_mount+0xe/0x40
	 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90
	 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs]
	 legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60
	 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0
	 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80
	 do_mount+0x75/0x90
	 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
	 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
	 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs]
	 check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs]
	 run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs]
	 writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs]
	 __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs]
	 extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs]
	 extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs]
	 do_writepages+0x40/0xe0
	 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610
	 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500
	 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0
	 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0
	 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340
	 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0
	 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
	 kthread+0x137/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
	 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
	 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
	 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20
	 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
	 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
	 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs]
	 evict+0xd6/0x1c0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
	 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0
	 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
	 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0
	 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750
	 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0
	 kthread+0x137/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(kernfs_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/76:
   #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0
   #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x77/0x97
   check_noncircular+0xff/0x110
   ? save_trace+0x50/0x470
   check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
   validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20
   ? save_trace+0x50/0x470
   __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
   lock_acquire+0xca/0x430
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
   __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
   ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
   ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs]
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs]
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs]
   evict+0xd6/0x1c0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
   super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
   do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0
   shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
   shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0
   balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750
   kswapd+0x206/0x4d0
   ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
   ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750
   kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start
adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency
on fs_reclaim via the tree lock.  Fix this by dropping the path before
we start doing anything with sysfs.

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>