powerpc/sstep: Fix incorrect return from analyze_instr()
authorAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.ibm.com>
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:06:43 +0000 (18:36 +0530)
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Sat, 30 Jan 2021 00:40:04 +0000 (11:40 +1100)
commit718aae916fa6619c57c348beaedd675835cf1aa1
tree60a77b05c95e0163382e4f6ac99902156122c1cd
parent8813ff49607eab3caaf40fe8929b0ce7dc68e85f
powerpc/sstep: Fix incorrect return from analyze_instr()

We currently just percolate the return value from analyze_instr()
to the caller of emulate_step(), especially if it is a -1.

For one particular case (opcode = 4) for instructions that aren't
currently emulated, we are returning 'should not be single-stepped'
while we should have returned 0 which says 'did not emulate, may
have to single-step'.

Fixes: 930d6288a26787 ("powerpc: sstep: Add support for maddhd, maddhdu, maddld instructions")
Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161157999039.64773.14950289716779364766.stgit@thinktux.local
arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c