locking/atomic: atomic64: Remove unusable atomic ops
authorMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:59:23 +0000 (11:59 +0000)
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:56:09 +0000 (10:56 +0100)
commit5fb6e8cf53b005d287d4c2d137a415ff7d025a81
tree5f57e4c9180cd6ee01add430b5c844c90457f24d
parent6773cc31a9bb5122fd5c288f73ca006ad20a6c17
locking/atomic: atomic64: Remove unusable atomic ops

The generic atomic64 implementation provides:

* atomic64_and_return()
* atomic64_or_return()
* atomic64_xor_return()

... but none of these exist in the standard atomic64 API as described by
scripts/atomic/atomics.tbl, and none of these have prototypes exposed by
<asm-generic/atomic64.h>.

The lkp kernel test robot noted this results in warnings when building with
W=1:

  lib/atomic64.c:82:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'generic_atomic64_and_return' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

  lib/atomic64.c:82:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'generic_atomic64_or_return' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

  lib/atomic64.c:82:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'generic_atomic64_xor_return' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

This appears to have been a thinko in commit:

  28aa2bda2211f432 ("locking/atomic: Implement atomic{,64,_long}_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}()")

... where we grouped add/sub separately from and/ox/xor, so that we could avoid
implementing _return forms for the latter group, but forgot to remove
ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN() for that group.

This doesn't cause any functional problem, but it's pointless to build code
which cannot be used. Remove the unusable code. This does not affect add/sub,
for which _return forms will still be built.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211126115923.41489-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
lib/atomic64.c