block: skip sync_blockdev() on surprise removal in bdev_mark_dead()
authorChao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
Fri, 22 May 2026 22:00:25 +0000 (18:00 -0400)
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tue, 26 May 2026 17:01:54 +0000 (11:01 -0600)
commit49f06cff50a4ccf3b7a1a662ceb892b3b21a527a
tree0227606bf78ba6a2d407ab82d0e12d328bd23434
parent4d94ec1bc12c4d9d6fe428e4cf2652e187058373
block: skip sync_blockdev() on surprise removal in bdev_mark_dead()

bdev_mark_dead()'s @surprise == true means the device is already gone.
The filesystem callback fs_bdev_mark_dead() honours this and skips
sync_filesystem(), but the bare block device path (no ->mark_dead op)
lost its !surprise guard when the holder ->mark_dead callback was wired
up (see Fixes), and now calls sync_blockdev() unconditionally, which can
hang forever waiting on writeback that can no longer complete.

syzkaller hit this via nvme_reset_work()'s "I/O queues lost" path:
nvme_mark_namespaces_dead() -> blk_mark_disk_dead() ->
bdev_mark_dead(bdev, true) -> sync_blockdev() blocks in
folio_wait_writeback(), wedging the reset worker and every task waiting
on it.

Skip the sync on surprise removal, matching fs_bdev_mark_dead();
invalidate_bdev() still runs. Orderly removal (surprise == false) is
unchanged.

Found by FuzzNvme(Syzkaller with FEMU fuzzing framework).

Fixes: d8530de5a6e8 ("block: call into the file system for bdev_mark_dead")
Acked-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
Acked-by: Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>
Acked-by: Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260522220025.1770388-1-coshi036@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
block/bdev.c