erofs: use feature_incompat rather than requirements
authorGao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:08:53 +0000 (10:08 +0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:10:07 +0000 (20:10 +0200)
commit426a930891cf17c5c16f12e8e2c8cb75c4cfff3c
tree8472b812f8bf6533d01c5cc134cdf5321a7dde80
parentc39747f770bee2060dc2409e52168a879978c467
erofs: use feature_incompat rather than requirements

As Christoph said [1], "This is only cosmetic, why
not stick to feature_compat and feature_incompat?"

In my thought, requirements means "incompatible"
instead of "feature" though.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-7-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fs/erofs/decompressor.c
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
fs/erofs/internal.h
fs/erofs/super.c