Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst: document why inactive_X + active_X may not...

Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst: document why inactive_X + active_X may not equal X

This has confused a significant number of people using cgroups inside
Facebook, and some of those outside as well judging by posts like
this[0] (although it's not a problem unique to cgroup v2).

If shmem handling in particular becomes more coherent at some point in
the future -- although that seems unlikely now -- we can change the
wording here.

[0]: https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/525092/10762

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191111144958.GA11914@chrisdown.name
Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>