X-Git-Url: http://git.monstr.eu/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=Documentation%2Ftrace%2Fftrace-uses.rst;h=f7d98ae5b8853e732d74c8be953eeb446d79059d;hb=2eeefc60ad70ffb7a5daf9f47aef5b1ebd1f39ad;hp=a4955f7e3d19ec86a053ee2ab9d74472a4f03688;hpb=43d6ecd97c0c69acffc918cc18cdabdfcaa55354;p=linux-2.6-microblaze.git diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst index a4955f7e3d19..f7d98ae5b885 100644 --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ The ftrace context This requires extra care to what can be done inside a callback. A callback can be called outside the protective scope of RCU. -The ftrace infrastructure has some protections against recursions and RCU -but one must still be very careful how they use the callbacks. +There are helper functions to help against recursion, and making sure +RCU is watching. These are explained below. The ftrace_ops structure @@ -108,6 +108,58 @@ The prototype of the callback function is as follows (as of v4.14): at the start of the function where ftrace was tracing. Otherwise it either contains garbage, or NULL. +Protect your callback +===================== + +As functions can be called from anywhere, and it is possible that a function +called by a callback may also be traced, and call that same callback, +recursion protection must be used. There are two helper functions that +can help in this regard. If you start your code with: + +.. code-block:: c + + int bit; + + bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip); + if (bit < 0) + return; + +and end it with: + +.. code-block:: c + + ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit); + +The code in between will be safe to use, even if it ends up calling a +function that the callback is tracing. Note, on success, +ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() will disable preemption, and the +ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() will enable it again (if it was previously +enabled). The instruction pointer (ip) and its parent (parent_ip) is passed to +ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() to record where the recursion happened +(if CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION is set). + +Alternatively, if the FTRACE_OPS_FL_RECURSION flag is set on the ftrace_ops +(as explained below), then a helper trampoline will be used to test +for recursion for the callback and no recursion test needs to be done. +But this is at the expense of a slightly more overhead from an extra +function call. + +If your callback accesses any data or critical section that requires RCU +protection, it is best to make sure that RCU is "watching", otherwise +that data or critical section will not be protected as expected. In this +case add: + +.. code-block:: c + + if (!rcu_is_watching()) + return; + +Alternatively, if the FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU flag is set on the ftrace_ops +(as explained below), then a helper trampoline will be used to test +for rcu_is_watching for the callback and no other test needs to be done. +But this is at the expense of a slightly more overhead from an extra +function call. + The ftrace FLAGS ================ @@ -128,26 +180,20 @@ FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS_IF_SUPPORTED will not fail with this flag set. But the callback must check if regs is NULL or not to determine if the architecture supports it. -FTRACE_OPS_FL_RECURSION_SAFE - By default, a wrapper is added around the callback to - make sure that recursion of the function does not occur. That is, - if a function that is called as a result of the callback's execution - is also traced, ftrace will prevent the callback from being called - again. But this wrapper adds some overhead, and if the callback is - safe from recursion, it can set this flag to disable the ftrace - protection. - - Note, if this flag is set, and recursion does occur, it could cause - the system to crash, and possibly reboot via a triple fault. - - It is OK if another callback traces a function that is called by a - callback that is marked recursion safe. Recursion safe callbacks - must never trace any function that are called by the callback - itself or any nested functions that those functions call. - - If this flag is set, it is possible that the callback will also - be called with preemption enabled (when CONFIG_PREEMPTION is set), - but this is not guaranteed. +FTRACE_OPS_FL_RECURSION + By default, it is expected that the callback can handle recursion. + But if the callback is not that worried about overehead, then + setting this bit will add the recursion protection around the + callback by calling a helper function that will do the recursion + protection and only call the callback if it did not recurse. + + Note, if this flag is not set, and recursion does occur, it could + cause the system to crash, and possibly reboot via a triple fault. + + Not, if this flag is set, then the callback will always be called + with preemption disabled. If it is not set, then it is possible + (but not guaranteed) that the callback will be called in + preemptable context. FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY Requires FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS set. If the callback is to "hijack"