platform/chrome: sensorhub: Fix typos

[linux-2.6-microblaze.git] / drivers / platform / chrome / cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
index 71948da..9e17f74 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensorhub_unregister_push_data);
  * @sensorhub: Sensor Hub object
  * @on: true when events are requested.
  *
- * To be called before sleeping or when noone is listening.
+ * To be called before sleeping or when no one is listening.
  * Return: 0 on success, or an error when we can not communicate with the EC.
  *
  */
@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ static s64 cros_ec_sensor_ring_median(s64 *array, size_t length)
  *
  * While a and b are recorded at accurate times (due to the EC real time
  * nature); c is pretty untrustworthy, even though it's recorded the
- * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good change we'll get
- * added lantency due to:
+ * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good chance we'll get
+ * added latency due to:
  *   other irqs
  *   ddrfreq
  *   cpuidle
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ cros_ec_sensor_ring_process_event(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub,
  *                                 ringbuffer.
  *
  * This is the new spreading code, assumes every sample's timestamp
- * preceeds the sample. Run if tight_timestamps == true.
+ * precedes the sample. Run if tight_timestamps == true.
  *
  * Sometimes the EC receives only one interrupt (hence timestamp) for
  * a batch of samples. Only the first sample will have the correct
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ cros_ec_sensor_ring_spread_add(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub,
                        } else {
                                /*
                                 * Push first sample in the batch to the,
-                                * kifo, it's guaranteed to be correct, the
+                                * kfifo, it's guaranteed to be correct, the
                                 * rest will follow later on.
                                 */
                                sample_idx = 1;
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ done_with_this_batch:
  *           last_out -->
  *
  *
- * We spread time for the samples using perod p = (current - TS1)/4.
+ * We spread time for the samples using period p = (current - TS1)/4.
  * between TS1 and TS2: [TS1+p/4, TS1+2p/4, TS1+3p/4, current_timestamp].
  *
  */