rq->mq_hctx = data->hctx;
rq->rq_flags = 0;
rq->cmd_flags = data->cmd_flags;
- if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT)
- rq->rq_flags |= RQF_PREEMPT;
+ if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PM)
+ rq->rq_flags |= RQF_PM;
if (blk_queue_io_stat(data->q))
rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ||
!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &rq->q->queue_flags))
return false;
+ /*
+ * With force threaded interrupts enabled, raising softirq from an SMP
+ * function call will always result in waking the ksoftirqd thread.
+ * This is probably worse than completing the request on a different
+ * cache domain.
+ */
+ if (force_irqthreads)
+ return false;
/* same CPU or cache domain? Complete locally */
if (cpu == rq->mq_ctx->cpu ||
{
int srcu_idx;
- /*
- * We should be running this queue from one of the CPUs that
- * are mapped to it.
- *
- * There are at least two related races now between setting
- * hctx->next_cpu from blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu() and running
- * __blk_mq_run_hw_queue():
- *
- * - hctx->next_cpu is found offline in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
- * but later it becomes online, then this warning is harmless
- * at all
- *
- * - hctx->next_cpu is found online in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
- * but later it becomes offline, then the warning can't be
- * triggered, and we depend on blk-mq timeout handler to
- * handle dispatched requests to this hctx
- */
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
- cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %s\n",
- raw_smp_processor_id(),
- cpumask_empty(hctx->cpumask) ? "inactive": "active");
- dump_stack();
- }
-
/*
* We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
* we catch bad users of this early.