p->se.vruntime (nanosec-unit) value. This way, it's possible to accurately
timestamp and measure the "expected CPU time" a task should have gotten.
-[ small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same
- p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task
- would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time. ]
+ Small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same
+ p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task
+ would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time.
CFS's task picking logic is based on this p->se.vruntime value and it is thus
very simple: it always tries to run the task with the smallest p->se.vruntime