+# R4600 erratum. Due to the lack of errata information the exact
+# technical details aren't known. I've experimentally found that disabling
+# interrupts during indexed I-cache flushes seems to be sufficient to deal
+# with the issue.
+config WAR_R4600_V1_INDEX_ICACHEOP
+ bool
+
+# Pleasures of the R4600 V1.x. Cite from the IDT R4600 V1.7 errata:
+#
+# 18. The CACHE instructions Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D, Hit_Writeback_D,
+# Hit_Invalidate_D and Create_Dirty_Excl_D should only be
+# executed if there is no other dcache activity. If the dcache is
+# accessed for another instruction immeidately preceding when these
+# cache instructions are executing, it is possible that the dcache
+# tag match outputs used by these cache instructions will be
+# incorrect. These cache instructions should be preceded by at least
+# four instructions that are not any kind of load or store
+# instruction.
+#
+# This is not allowed: lw
+# nop
+# nop
+# nop
+# cache Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D
+#
+# This is allowed: lw
+# nop
+# nop
+# nop
+# nop
+# cache Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D
+config WAR_R4600_V1_HIT_CACHEOP
+ bool
+
+# Writeback and invalidate the primary cache dcache before DMA.
+#
+# R4600 v2.0 bug: "The CACHE instructions Hit_Writeback_Inv_D,
+# Hit_Writeback_D, Hit_Invalidate_D and Create_Dirty_Exclusive_D will only
+# operate correctly if the internal data cache refill buffer is empty. These
+# CACHE instructions should be separated from any potential data cache miss
+# by a load instruction to an uncached address to empty the response buffer."
+# (Revision 2.0 device errata from IDT available on https://www.idt.com/
+# in .pdf format.)
+config WAR_R4600_V2_HIT_CACHEOP
+ bool
+
+# From TX49/H2 manual: "If the instruction (i.e. CACHE) is issued for
+# the line which this instruction itself exists, the following
+# operation is not guaranteed."
+#
+# Workaround: do two phase flushing for Index_Invalidate_I
+config WAR_TX49XX_ICACHE_INDEX_INV
+ bool
+
+# The RM7000 processors and the E9000 cores have a bug (though PMC-Sierra
+# opposes it being called that) where invalid instructions in the same
+# I-cache line worth of instructions being fetched may case spurious
+# exceptions.
+config WAR_ICACHE_REFILLS
+ bool
+
+# On the R10000 up to version 2.6 (not sure about 2.7) there is a bug that
+# may cause ll / sc and lld / scd sequences to execute non-atomically.
+config WAR_R10000_LLSC
+ bool
+
+# 34K core erratum: "Problems Executing the TLBR Instruction"
+config WAR_MIPS34K_MISSED_ITLB
+ bool
+