+Protect your callback
+=====================
+
+As functions can be called from anywhere, and it is possible that a function
+called by a callback may also be traced, and call that same callback,
+recursion protection must be used. There are two helper functions that
+can help in this regard. If you start your code with:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ int bit;
+
+ bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
+ if (bit < 0)
+ return;
+
+and end it with:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
+
+The code in between will be safe to use, even if it ends up calling a
+function that the callback is tracing. Note, on success,
+ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() will disable preemption, and the
+ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() will enable it again (if it was previously
+enabled). The instruction pointer (ip) and its parent (parent_ip) is passed to
+ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() to record where the recursion happened
+(if CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION is set).
+
+Alternatively, if the FTRACE_OPS_FL_RECURSION flag is set on the ftrace_ops
+(as explained below), then a helper trampoline will be used to test
+for recursion for the callback and no recursion test needs to be done.
+But this is at the expense of a slightly more overhead from an extra
+function call.
+
+If your callback accesses any data or critical section that requires RCU
+protection, it is best to make sure that RCU is "watching", otherwise
+that data or critical section will not be protected as expected. In this
+case add:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ if (!rcu_is_watching())
+ return;
+
+Alternatively, if the FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU flag is set on the ftrace_ops
+(as explained below), then a helper trampoline will be used to test
+for rcu_is_watching for the callback and no other test needs to be done.
+But this is at the expense of a slightly more overhead from an extra
+function call.
+